Injured? Call Us Now!
In a personal injury case, the plaintiff must prove that the other party’s negligence caused their injuries. This can include everything from car accidents to medical malpractice. But what if the negligence is so egregious that it causes injuries that are not directly related to the accident but are still serious enough to merit compensation? This is when a personal injury claim may be expanded into a broader claim for intentional torts such as intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED).In order to succeed on an IIED claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant intended to cause them emotional distress. This is a very high standard that is rarely met in personal injury cases. However, in certain circumstances, a person may be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress even if they did not intend to cause the victim harm. In other words, the fact that the other party did not intend to cause the plaintiff distress does not preclude the plaintiff from recovering damages. This article explains what intentional infliction of emotional distress is, how it is different from other intentional torts, and when it can be used as part of a personal injury lawsuit.
What is intentional infliction of emotional distress?
The tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is an intentional tort that occurs when someone intends to cause another person emotional harm. This can include causing them to experience fear, anxiety, or depression. IIED is a very specific type of intentional tort. Unlike other types of intentional torts, such as assault or battery, IIED does not require the person to actually touch the victim. In other words, the perpetrator does not need to physically put another person in danger in order to be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress.IIED can also be used to describe a broader category of torts that are not necessarily intentional. For example, if a landlord fails to provide heat in the winter or hot water in the summer and the tenants suffer serious health consequences as a result, then the landlord may be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
How is IIED different from other intentional torts?
The most important difference between intentional infliction of emotional distress and other intentional torts is that the perpetrator must intend to cause the victim emotional harm. This means that the perpetrator must intend to cause the victim serious emotional harm, such as anxiety or depression. In contrast, most other intentional torts do not require the perpetrator to intend to cause the victim serious emotional harm. For example, if a person shoots another person on purpose, they may be liable for assault, but they are not liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In other words, the shooter must have a specific intent to cause serious harm, but they do not have to intend to cause the victim serious emotional harm.IIED also differs from other intentional torts in that the perpetrator’s intention is not the only thing that matters. The fact that the perpetrator knew or should have known that their actions would cause serious emotional harm is also important. For example, if a landlord fails to provide heat in the winter and the tenants suffer serious health consequences as a result, then the landlord may be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. However, if the tenants knew that the landlord did not provide heat and they still chose to live there anyway, then they would not be liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
When does intentional infliction of emotional distress apply?
The main factor that determines whether a personal injury lawsuit can be expanded into a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is the nature of the injuries. If the injuries are severe enough, the court may allow the plaintiff to expand their lawsuit into a claim for intentional torts. For example, if a person is in a car accident and sustains a broken leg, then they would likely be able to expand their lawsuit into a claim for negligence. However, if the person sustains a broken leg and a broken arm, then they would likely not be able to expand their lawsuit into a claim for negligence. If the person is in a car accident and sustains a broken leg and a broken arm, then they would likely be able to expand their lawsuit into a claim for intentional torts, such as intentional infliction of emotional distress.In order to expand a lawsuit into a claim for intentional torts, the injuries must be extreme enough to cause serious emotional harm. This is often referred to as “severe emotional distress.” The courts have set the standard for “severe emotional distress” at a level that is much higher than the “substantial injury” standard used to determine the amount of damages in a personal injury lawsuit. This is because the goal of a personal injury lawsuit is to compensate the victim for their injuries, while the goal of an intentional torts lawsuit is to punish the perpetrator and prevent them from doing it again. In other words, the amount of damages that the court may award in an intentional torts lawsuit is much higher than what is awarded for injuries in a personal injury lawsuit.
How should you handle an IIED claim?
The best way to defend against an IIED claim is to hire a personal injury attorney. A personal injury attorney can help you understand what your legal options are and how to present your case in the best light. They can also help you determine whether you have a legitimate claim for intentional torts, such as IIED. If you decide that you do have a legitimate claim for intentional torts, then the attorney can also help you determine whether you have a legitimate claim for intentional torts. If you decide that you do have a legitimate claim for intentional torts, then the attorney can help you draft a complaint that is specific to intentional torts.If you were injured in a car accident and the other party was negligent, then you may have a claim for negligence. However, if the other party’s negligence was so egregious that it also caused you severe emotional distress, then you may have a claim for intentional torts, such as intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Summing up
In a personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that the other party’s negligence caused their injuries. This can include everything from car accidents to medical malpractice. However, in certain circumstances, a person may be liable for intentional torts, such as intentional infliction of emotional distress, even if they did not intend to cause the victim harm.The main factor that determines whether a personal injury lawsuit can be expanded into a claim for intentional torts is the nature of the injuries. If the injuries are severe enough, the court may allow the plaintiff to expand their lawsuit into a claim for intentional torts.In order to expand a lawsuit into a claim for intentional torts, the injuries must be extreme enough to cause serious emotional harm. This is often referred to as “severe emotional distress.” The courts have set the standard for “severe emotional distress” at a level that is much higher than the “substantial injury” standard used to determine the amount of damages in a personal injury lawsuit.The best way to defend against an IIED claim is to hire a personal injury attorney. A personal injury attorney can help you understand what your legal options are and how to present your case in the best light. They can also help you determine whether you have a legitimate claim for intentional torts, such as IIED.
Injured? Call Us Now!